hawkins_huggins.m4a |
Inquiry based learning revolves around the idea that knowledge is doing. It is student-centered and teacher-guided. This type of learning is hands-on and completes investigations of real world questions. When you engage in inquiry based learning, you are constructing your own knowledge. The benefits of using inquiry based learning are self-direction for students, teaches critical skills (such as problem solving, critical thinking, and disciplinary content), and develops student ownership. Students are responsible for their own learning and therefore become more engaged in participation. There are also downsides to using this type of learning: some students will not be motivated to complete their own work, therefore, not completing the learning process. Also, not every student likes hands-on activities; they may be auditory learners and will learn better in a different environment. If every student is not on the same level, inquiry based learning can fail because it builds on prior knowledge. An example of inquiry based learning could be having your students in science class complete a forensic investigation of a fictional crime scene. They could complete experiments and research in order to reach the end goal of knowledge.
Constructivism is based on the theory that students create their knowledge based on prior experiences. Jean Piaget is one of the founding theorists for constructivism. This theory elaborates on the roles of individuals, specifically the teacher and the learner, and also elaborates on the importance of collaboration among the learners. Students generate knowledge and meaning from an interaction between their experiences and their thoughts. In short, constructivism bases new learning on the ideas of old knowledge. The benefits of this type of learning is that students already have prior knowledge of the studied subject and it is a great scaffolding tool. Also, students can learn more because they are participating with feedback and it is more than just memorizing text. The learning becomes more personal. The downsides of using this theory are again, if students are not on the same page. Disadvantaged children lacking resources may struggle when using this theory because they will not be equipped with prior experiences that others may have. An example of constructivism could be a field trip to a nearby lake to complete sampling experiments. This could then lead to a study on ecosystems in the future.
Problem-based learning is based on student needs. Students will work in groups to collaborate on prior knowledge, current questions on topics of interest, and research. Teachers facilitate learning through scaffolding and students will answer leading questions and participate in grand conversations. The question may not have a "yes" or "no" answer, but a broad idea which can be converted into a theory or law. The benefits of using this type of learning are that students will examine the "bigger picture" rather than just their schoolwork and also that students will collaborate with others to solve a problem. This can be a great networking tool for students in the future. The downsides to using problem-based learning are that students may not enjoy working in groups or one student will dominate the group. The teacher could actually even dominate the classroom by extension. An example of problem-based learning could be asking your students any question that begins with "What if..?" and having them figure it out in groups.
Webquests are an influential tool to use in the classroom. They incorporate technology in learning. They are based on inquiry learning and are completed entirely through the Internet. From word processing to in-depth research, students will complete an inquiry based task while using technology. The benefits of using webquests are that students will be completely immersed in technology and they can research the newest topics with ease. The downsides of using webquests are that the connection between teacher and student becomes impersonal and students may not understand the technology. Also, technical problems could arise or resources could be limited, especially in a low-income school. An example of a webquest could be a virtual dissection of a frog.
As we both reflect on what we have learned today, we realize the importance of differing styles of learning in the classroom. We both looked at our webquests that we completed in our previous class and realized it was actually not constructive! We told our students exactly what to do rather than to place them in the situation and how it affects them personally. This was an eye opener! We now understand that webquests and learning must be based entirely on the student to increase student motivation and participation. Students will be more willing to learn if they understand the topic's importance and how it relates to them. We both agreed that inquiry based learning was the theory that we would use in our classrooms because it allows for the most student participation. Students will be responsible for the learning process in a student-centered classroom. We, as teachers, will guide our students but will allow them to experiment for themselves.
Learning can be found in many forms and each student learns differently. It is important for teachers to remember these theories to promote the highest level of learning to their students. Besides, isn't it time that students take some responsibility for learning these days? We think it will benefit not only the teachers but also the students whenever they self-motivate to learn.
After we Skyped, we then texted each other to discuss our plans for the blog. Texting can be another great tool for collaboration and communication in the classroom. PollEverywhere is a technology where a teacher could instantly poll their students with cellphones and text messages. Teachers must review their Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) for their district and school before they instruct their students to use their cellphones; however, this has been a beneficial tool for engaging students with technology. Student cellphone use must be limited and controlled for positive results, but if the teacher is truly willing to try a new strategy, the students will appreciate them for it.
Collaboration and communication is the foundation of strong teaching. Teachers must incorporate these elements into their classroom to enhance the learning process. By including technology in the curriculum, students and teachers will both observe positive results.